PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRS having a 13.56% return and VB slightly higher at 14.16%. Over the past 10 years, DGRS has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 9.61%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


DGRS

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.71%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.61%

VB

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.12%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
13.56%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.16%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and VB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2013

0.89

The correlation between DGRS and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
VB

Financial Services

24.8%
12.6%

Industrials

19.0%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
11.3%

Energy

12.0%
4.7%

Technology

8.7%
17.2%

Basic Materials

7.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
7.6%

Healthcare

1.3%
11.1%

Utilities

0.2%
3.3%

Financial Services

DGRS
24.8%
VB
12.6%

Industrials

DGRS
19.0%
VB
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.5%
VB
11.3%

Energy

DGRS
12.0%
VB
4.7%

Technology

DGRS
8.7%
VB
17.2%

Basic Materials

DGRS
7.6%
VB
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
VB
3.4%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
VB
3.1%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.7%
VB
7.6%

Healthcare

DGRS
1.3%
VB
11.1%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
VB
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRSVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.78

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

2.56

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.22

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.01

11.87

-3.87

DGRS vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRSVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.78

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.34

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.44

-0.03

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-59.56%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.98%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-25.36%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-28.15%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-42.05%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.65%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-8.44%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.43%

+0.72%

Volatility

DGRS vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.42%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

11.72%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

16.28%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

20.74%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

21.42%

+2.21%

DGRS vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.23%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and VB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRS has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.30% vs 9.61% for DGRS. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.05% for VB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer