DGRE vs. SCHY
DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index (Net). DGRE is actively managed, while SCHY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRE returned 8.99%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for SCHY. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHY.
Performance
DGRE vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHY's 13.77% return.
DGRE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 1Y
- 46.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
SCHY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 26.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.85K | $419.81K | $483.14K | |
| $28.53M | $25.92M | $19.89M |
DGRE vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 27.49% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | -4.22% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 13.77% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRE and SCHY is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between DGRE and SCHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRE vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRE
SCHY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
DGRE
SCHY
Financial Services
DGRE
SCHY
Industrials
DGRE
SCHY
Basic Materials
DGRE
SCHY
Healthcare
DGRE
SCHY
Consumer Cyclical
DGRE
SCHY
Consumer Defensive
DGRE
SCHY
Energy
DGRE
SCHY
Utilities
DGRE
SCHY
Communication Services
DGRE
SCHY
Real Estate
DGRE
SCHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRE vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank
DGRE
SCHY
DGRE vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRE | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.94 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 8.37 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRE vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and SCHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRE | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -24.04% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -9.11% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -12.16% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | -24.04% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -0.51% | -5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -4.92% | -7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 3.19% | +1.20% |
Volatility
DGRE vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) at 2.67%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRE | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 2.67% | +5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.70% | 9.96% | +12.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 11.99% | +12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 13.27% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 13.17% | +6.83% |
DGRE vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRE vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison
DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than SCHY's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.32% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRE and SCHY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to SCHY (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs SCHY's -24.04%.
On 5-year performance, SCHY leads with 9.17% vs 8.99% for DGRE. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHY has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.
SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.30% for DGRE.
DGRE is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHY is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.08% for SCHY.
SCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRE and SCHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer