PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 34.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.15%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.


DGRE

1D
-0.69%
1M
7.62%
YTD
34.34%
6M
36.58%
1Y
59.93%
3Y*
25.29%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
10.15%

SCHG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
2.76%
6M
2.11%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
34.34%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.76%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and SCHG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.60

The correlation between DGRE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRE vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRE
SCHG

Technology

41.5%
46.7%

Financial Services

17.8%
6.6%

Industrials

11.8%
6.0%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
12.4%

Healthcare

4.8%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
15.3%

Utilities

2.2%
0.4%

Energy

1.9%
0.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.5%

Technology

DGRE
41.5%
SCHG
46.7%

Financial Services

DGRE
17.8%
SCHG
6.6%

Industrials

DGRE
11.8%
SCHG
6.0%

Basic Materials

DGRE
6.6%
SCHG
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRE
5.5%
SCHG
12.4%

Healthcare

DGRE
4.8%
SCHG
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DGRE
4.5%
SCHG
1.6%

Communication Services

DGRE
2.6%
SCHG
15.3%

Utilities

DGRE
2.2%
SCHG
0.4%

Energy

DGRE
1.9%
SCHG
0.7%

Real Estate

DGRE
0.8%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.23

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

1.28

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

4.19

+13.18

DGRE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-34.59%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-16.41%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-23.39%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

-34.59%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-34.59%

-2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-5.16%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-5.20%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

5.00%

-1.54%

Volatility

DGRE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.78%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

5.78%

+4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

12.50%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.00%

16.21%

+5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

22.37%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

21.61%

-1.79%

DGRE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.16%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to SCHG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.81% vs 10.15% for DGRE. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.81% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

DGRE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.04% for SCHG.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer