PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGP vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGP vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a -14.58% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 9.63% return.


DGP

1D
-3.65%
1M
-17.84%
YTD
-14.58%
6M
-21.57%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
49.95%
5Y*
29.64%
10Y*
17.25%

FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGP vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
-14.58%141.40%53.16%16.97%-5.54%-11.29%45.29%32.27%15.54%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DGP and FNILX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.08

Over the past year, DGP and FNILX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGP vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGP vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGPFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.38

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

2.94

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

12.99

-11.06

DGP vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGP and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGP vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGPFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-33.76%

-41.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.98%

-9.01%

-34.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.98%

-19.08%

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

-25.40%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.16%

-1.73%

-41.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.08%

-5.35%

-35.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.71%

2.03%

+14.68%

Volatility

DGP vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 17.11% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 4.82%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGPFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.11%

4.82%

+12.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.95%

9.90%

+39.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.67%

12.61%

+42.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.27%

17.34%

+21.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.31%

20.04%

+15.27%

DGP vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGP vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGP and FNILX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGP has higher volatility (17.11%) compared to FNILX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGP and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer