DGIFX vs. OAKMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DGIFX (Disciplined Growth Investors Fund) and OAKMX (Oakmark Fund Investor Class) are both mutual funds - DGIFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by DGI, while OAKMX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Oakmark. Over the past 10 years, DGIFX returned 12.34%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for OAKMX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGIFX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for OAKMX.

Performance

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGIFX achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than OAKMX's -2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DGIFX has underperformed OAKMX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while OAKMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.

DGIFX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 16.26%
• 6M: 14.08%
• 1Y: 24.11%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

OAKMX

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: -2.30%
• 6M: 0.23%
• 1Y: 10.31%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 13.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	16.26%	3.54%	21.13%	33.10%	-18.35%	9.59%	24.07%	23.97%	-2.39%	14.86%
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class	-2.30%	14.13%	16.02%	30.92%	-13.38%	34.85%	12.90%	27.14%	-12.76%	21.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIFX and OAKMX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between DGIFX and OAKMX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DGIFX vs. OAKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIFX

DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 31
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

OAKMX

OAKMX Risk / Return Rank: 12
OAKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
OAKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
OAKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
OAKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
OAKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGIFX	OAKMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	0.76	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.18	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.14	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	1.43	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	3.64	+3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the OAKMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIFX and OAKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGIFX	OAKMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	0.76	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.50	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.65	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.70	0.00

Drawdowns

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIFX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum OAKMX drawdown of -56.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIFX and OAKMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGIFX	OAKMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.93%	-56.19%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-6.98%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.93%	-17.05%	-13.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.93%	-23.68%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.93%	-41.43%	+10.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-4.80%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-6.39%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.73%	+0.77%

Volatility

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Volatility Comparison

Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) at 3.21%. This indicates that DGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OAKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGIFX	OAKMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	3.21%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.18%	9.44%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	13.08%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.12%	18.30%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	20.40%	-1.74%

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKMX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGIFX vs. OAKMX - Dividend Comparison

DGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than OAKMX's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	7.09%	8.29%	20.95%	2.78%	2.21%	11.12%	10.09%	3.53%	3.74%	4.29%	0.00%	0.00%
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class	0.94%	0.92%	1.12%	1.02%	0.92%	1.94%	0.17%	8.33%	8.13%	4.06%	2.58%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGIFX and OAKMX in my portfolio?

DGIFX and OAKMX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGIFX or OAKMX?

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to OAKMX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIFX dropped -30.93% vs OAKMX's -56.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.