DGCFX vs. BND

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DGCFX (DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both funds - DGCFX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Dimensional, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 5 years, DGCFX returned 0.05%/yr vs -0.43%/yr for BND. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DGCFX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

DGCFX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCFX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.30% return.

DGCFX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: -0.21%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 1Y: 2.44%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.46%

BND

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.97%
• 6M: -0.42%
• YTD: -0.30%
• 1Y: 2.00%
• 3Y*: 4.04%
• 5Y*: -0.43%
• 10Y*: 1.40%
• ALL TIME*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	$459.14M	$504.12M	$590.88M
DGCFX DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DGCFX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGCFX DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio	0.45%	6.12%	3.57%	10.01%	-15.88%	-2.04%	8.51%	11.55%	1.13%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	-0.30%	7.08%	1.38%	5.65%	-13.11%	-1.86%	7.71%	8.84%	2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCFX and BND is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018	0.85

The correlation between DGCFX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DGCFX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGCFX

DGCFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
DGCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DGCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
DGCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
DGCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
DGCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 24
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGCFX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGCFX	BND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	0.56	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.81	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.09	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	0.75	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	1.86	+0.80

DGCFX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCFX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGCFX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCFX drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCFX and BND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGCFX	BND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.77%	-18.58%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.19%	-2.68%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.20%	-4.81%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.63%	-17.81%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-2.92%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-3.06%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.07%	-0.02%

Volatility

DGCFX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio (DGCFX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.00% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGCFX	BND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	1.02%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	2.91%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	3.61%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.47%	6.03%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.89%	5.53%	-0.64%

DGCFX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DGCFX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

DGCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than BND's 4.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	4.04%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%
DGCFX DFA Global Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio	4.79%	4.22%	4.40%	4.03%	2.26%	2.45%	1.78%	1.92%	6.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGCFX and BND in my portfolio?

DGCFX and BND have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGCFX or BND?

BND has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to DGCFX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCFX dropped -21.77% vs BND's -18.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.