PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFUSX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFUSX and FBGRX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.84%
12.78%
DFUSX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFUSX:

2.13

FBGRX:

1.59

Sortino Ratio

DFUSX:

2.83

FBGRX:

2.13

Omega Ratio

DFUSX:

1.39

FBGRX:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

DFUSX:

3.23

FBGRX:

2.18

Martin Ratio

DFUSX:

13.53

FBGRX:

6.61

Ulcer Index

DFUSX:

2.02%

FBGRX:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

DFUSX:

12.86%

FBGRX:

20.63%

Max Drawdown

DFUSX:

-54.96%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

DFUSX:

0.00%

FBGRX:

-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUSX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 11.49%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


DFUSX

YTD

3.54%

1M

1.97%

6M

12.84%

1Y

26.69%

5Y*

11.45%

10Y*

11.49%

FBGRX

YTD

4.27%

1M

1.59%

6M

12.78%

1Y

32.04%

5Y*

15.99%

10Y*

13.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for DFUSX: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFUSX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFUSX is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFUSX, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.131.59
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFUSX, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.832.13
The chart of Omega ratio for DFUSX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.391.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFUSX, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.232.18
The chart of Martin ratio for DFUSX, currently valued at 13.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0013.536.61
DFUSX
FBGRX

The current DFUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUSX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.13
1.59
DFUSX
FBGRX

Dividends

DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than FBGRX's 0.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
1.17%1.21%1.34%1.58%1.14%1.60%1.76%1.95%1.86%2.08%2.02%1.81%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.22%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-0.62%
DFUSX
FBGRX

Volatility

DFUSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) is 4.03%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that DFUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.03%
5.68%
DFUSX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab