PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSPX vs. FNIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFSPX having a 9.72% return and FNIDX slightly lower at 9.37%.


DFSPX

1D
2.41%
1M
2.11%
6M
5.20%
YTD
9.72%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
9.75%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

FNIDX

1D
2.64%
1M
-0.12%
6M
4.18%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSPX
DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
9.72%32.97%4.99%18.37%-17.70%12.12%11.64%24.22%-15.53%12.13%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
9.37%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSPX and FNIDX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.94

The correlation between DFSPX and FNIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSPX vs. FNIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSPX
DFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSPXFNIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.93

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

7.01

-0.39

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FNIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSPX and FNIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than FNIDX's maximum drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSPX and FNIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSPXFNIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-33.17%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-11.36%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-14.92%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-32.79%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.85%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-8.15%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.12%

+0.16%

Volatility

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that DFSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSPXFNIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

5.11%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

14.54%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

16.68%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.14%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.65%

-0.69%

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSPX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FNIDX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSPX vs. FNIDX - Dividend Comparison

DFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than FNIDX's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSPX
DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
2.92%3.06%3.06%2.59%2.27%2.64%1.44%2.52%2.60%2.32%2.48%2.43%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.57%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFSPX and FNIDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNIDX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DFSPX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSPX dropped -35.86% vs FNIDX's -33.17%.

DFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSPX and FNIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer