DFSIX vs. DFAC
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC).
DFSIX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Mar 12, 2008. DFAC is an actively managed fund by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFSIX or DFAC.
Key characteristics
| DFSIX | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.39% | 23.69% |
| 1Y Return | 36.56% | 33.89% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.54% | 8.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.00 | 2.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.05 | 3.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.85 | 4.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.53 | 18.68 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.05% | 2.00% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.32% | 12.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.65% | -23.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.66% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSIX and DFAC is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DFSIX achieves a 26.39% return, which is significantly higher than DFAC's 23.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSIX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison
DFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than DFAC's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSIX DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio | 1.02% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 0.95% | 1.19% | 1.18% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 1.49% | 1.55% | 1.36% | 1.23% |
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSIX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSIX and DFAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFSIX vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.