DFSCX vs. RWJ
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ).
DFSCX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Dec 23, 1981. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFSCX or RWJ.
Correlation
The correlation between DFSCX and RWJ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DFSCX:
-0.12
RWJ:
-0.17
DFSCX:
-0.04
RWJ:
-0.10
DFSCX:
1.00
RWJ:
0.99
DFSCX:
-0.03
RWJ:
-0.19
DFSCX:
-0.38
RWJ:
-0.57
DFSCX:
6.65%
RWJ:
6.28%
DFSCX:
20.19%
RWJ:
21.07%
DFSCX:
-97.78%
RWJ:
-55.97%
DFSCX:
-80.89%
RWJ:
-17.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly higher than RWJ's -10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 3.73%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.79% annualized return.
DFSCX
-9.04%
-5.82%
-7.08%
-1.54%
15.82%
3.73%
RWJ
-10.60%
-7.90%
-9.83%
-2.41%
27.03%
8.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFSCX vs. RWJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DFSCX
RWJ
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison
DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than RWJ's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 0.83% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.08% | 0.92% | 0.87% | 0.81% | 0.83% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 0.89% | 0.71% |
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 1.29% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.74% | 0.57% |
Drawdowns
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -97.78%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and RWJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFSCX vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) is 5.97%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that DFSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.