DFND vs. QLEIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both funds - DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while QLEIX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. DFND is passively managed, while QLEIX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFND returned 7.15%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for QLEIX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.

Performance

DFND vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DFND has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 7.15%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.18%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

QLEIX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 25.79%
• 5Y*: 23.47%
• 10Y*: 12.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	19.53%	-1.83%	16.33%
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	-0.52%	34.43%	30.50%	23.95%	19.18%	31.10%	-13.92%	1.19%	-16.33%	15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and QLEIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016	0.19

The correlation between DFND and QLEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFND vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLEIX

QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFND	QLEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	2.16	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	3.15	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.40	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	2.64	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	8.20	-7.12

DFND vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and QLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFND vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and QLEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFND	QLEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.65%	-38.11%	+15.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.44%	-6.01%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.56%	-7.07%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.65%	-17.07%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.65%	-38.11%	+15.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-1.13%	-2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-7.70%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	1.93%	+1.79%

Volatility

DFND vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFND	QLEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	2.82%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.10%	5.76%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	7.37%	+3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.44%	10.02%	+12.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.08%	10.59%	+8.49%

DFND vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFND vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	1.76%	1.75%	7.12%	20.88%	14.15%	0.00%	1.57%	0.00%	6.03%	9.11%	3.01%	4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFND and QLEIX in my portfolio?

DFND and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFND or QLEIX?

QLEIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.