PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLVX vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFLVX having a 14.74% return and FNDX slightly lower at 14.72%. Over the past 10 years, DFLVX has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.82%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.28% annualized return.


DFLVX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
14.74%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
11.82%

FNDX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.39%
YTD
14.72%
6M
15.53%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
14.74%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.72%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLVX and FNDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.96

The correlation between DFLVX and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLVX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVXFNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

3.28

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.37

4.59

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.60

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

5.55

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.61

21.77

-1.17

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLVX and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVXFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

3.28

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.82

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.79

-0.27

Drawdowns

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLVX drawdown since its inception was -65.65%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLVX and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVXFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.65%

-37.72%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-6.06%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-16.30%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-19.06%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.79%

-37.72%

-4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-3.55%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.55%

+0.04%

Volatility

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.37%. This indicates that DFLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLVXFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.37%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

7.27%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

10.21%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

15.18%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

17.50%

+0.88%

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFLVX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

DFLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.47%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFLVX and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLVX dropped -65.65% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLVX and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer