PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFKCY vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFKCY and QQQ is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

DFKCY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daifuku Co. Ltd (DFKCY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
14.98%
14.48%
DFKCY
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFKCY:

0.04

QQQ:

1.24

Sortino Ratio

DFKCY:

0.34

QQQ:

1.71

Omega Ratio

DFKCY:

1.04

QQQ:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

DFKCY:

0.02

QQQ:

1.68

Martin Ratio

DFKCY:

0.09

QQQ:

5.78

Ulcer Index

DFKCY:

17.86%

QQQ:

3.93%

Daily Std Dev

DFKCY:

36.41%

QQQ:

18.32%

Max Drawdown

DFKCY:

-96.91%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

DFKCY:

-95.53%

QQQ:

-1.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFKCY achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 3.28% return.


DFKCY

YTD

-0.19%

1M

3.42%

6M

15.01%

1Y

-5.35%

5Y*

-38.91%

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

3.28%

1M

4.10%

6M

14.48%

1Y

22.00%

5Y*

18.51%

10Y*

18.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFKCY vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFKCY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFKCY is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFKCY is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFKCY is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFKCY is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFKCY is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFKCY is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFKCY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daifuku Co. Ltd (DFKCY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFKCY, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.041.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFKCY, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.341.71
The chart of Omega ratio for DFKCY, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.041.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFKCY, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.021.68
The chart of Martin ratio for DFKCY, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.095.78
DFKCY
QQQ

The current DFKCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFKCY and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.04
1.24
DFKCY
QQQ

Dividends

DFKCY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

DFKCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than QQQ's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFKCY
Daifuku Co. Ltd
0.79%0.79%1.28%1.52%0.93%0.05%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.54%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

DFKCY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFKCY drawdown since its inception was -96.91%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFKCY and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-95.53%
-1.73%
DFKCY
QQQ

Volatility

DFKCY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Daifuku Co. Ltd (DFKCY) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.32%. This indicates that DFKCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.15%
5.32%
DFKCY
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab