DFH vs. OLMA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DFH (Dream Finders Homes, Inc.) and OLMA (Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. DFH operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while OLMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, DFH returned -9.68%/yr vs -17.80%/yr for OLMA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DFH vs. OLMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFH achieves a -15.56% return, which is significantly higher than OLMA's -60.00% return.

DFH

• 1D: -7.44%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: -15.56%
• 6M: -18.88%
• 1Y: -35.36%
• 3Y*: -14.11%
• 5Y*: -9.68%
• 10Y*: —

OLMA

• 1D: 5.15%
• 1M: -26.90%
• YTD: -60.00%
• 6M: -64.51%
• 1Y: 142.13%
• 3Y*: 8.31%
• 5Y*: -17.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFH vs. OLMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFH Dream Finders Homes, Inc.	-15.56%	-26.51%	-34.51%	310.28%	-55.48%	-0.31%
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	-60.00%	328.82%	-58.45%	472.65%	-73.82%	-77.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DFH and OLMA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap DFH : $1.33B OLMA : $1.03B
EPS DFH : $1.77 OLMA : -$2.03
PB Ratio DFH : 1.05 OLMA : 2.14
Total Revenue (TTM) DFH : $4.22B OLMA : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) DFH : $561.30M OLMA : -$187.00K
EBITDA (TTM) DFH : $234.81M OLMA : -$197.79M

Return for Risk

DFH vs. OLMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFH

DFH Risk / Return Rank: 18
DFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
DFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
DFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DFH Martin Ratio Rank: 22

OLMA

OLMA Risk / Return Rank: 79
OLMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
OLMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
OLMA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OLMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OLMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFH vs. OLMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFH	OLMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	0.89	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	3.24	-4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.41	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	1.92	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	3.89	-4.83

DFH vs. OLMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFH Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the OLMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFH and OLMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFH vs. OLMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFH drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, smaller than the maximum OLMA drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFH and OLMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFH	OLMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.38%	-96.26%	+20.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.44%	-74.35%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.26%	-82.15%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.26%	-93.36%	+22.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.98%	-81.65%	+14.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.00%	-74.99%	+32.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.58%	36.69%	+0.89%

Volatility

DFH vs. OLMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) is 15.96%, while Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) has a volatility of 22.54%. This indicates that DFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFH	OLMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.96%	22.54%	-6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.27%	53.62%	-13.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	160.85%	-105.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.24%	107.89%	-52.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.97%	106.13%	-49.16%

Dividends

DFH vs. OLMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFH nor OLMA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFH and OLMA in my portfolio?

DFH and OLMA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFH or OLMA?

OLMA has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to DFH (15.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFH dropped -75.38% vs OLMA's -96.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OLMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.