DFGR vs. VOO
DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFGR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DFGR is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFGR returned 8.89%/yr vs 22.44%/yr for VOO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DFGR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFGR achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
DFGR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
DFGR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 7.61% | 7.65% | 1.89% | 9.64% | -1.24% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGR and VOO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DFGR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFGR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFGR
VOO
Real Estate
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
DFGR
VOO
Financial Services
DFGR
VOO
Technology
DFGR
VOO
Communication Services
DFGR
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
DFGR
VOO
Healthcare
DFGR
VOO
Industrials
DFGR
VOO
Consumer Defensive
DFGR
VOO
Energy
DFGR
VOO
Utilities
DFGR
VOO
Basic Materials
DFGR
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFGR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DFGR
VOO
DFGR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.16 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 14.73 | -10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.39 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.89 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
DFGR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -33.99% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -8.90% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -18.69% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -0.70% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -3.69% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.91% | +0.67% |
Volatility
DFGR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that DFGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFGR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.84% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 8.90% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 11.80% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 16.81% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 18.01% | -2.59% |
DFGR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFGR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 3.95% | 4.05% | 3.73% | 2.77% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFGR and VOO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFGR has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs 8.89% for DFGR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGR.
DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
DFGR is categorized as REIT, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFGR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer