DFEV vs. SPEM
DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. DFEV is actively managed, while SPEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEV returned 25.84%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for SPEM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFEV charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
DFEV vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 12.45% return.
DFEV
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPEM
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
DFEV vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 29.46% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 12.45% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -4.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEV and SPEM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DFEV and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFEV vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEV
SPEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
DFEV
SPEM
Financial Services
DFEV
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
DFEV
SPEM
Industrials
DFEV
SPEM
Energy
DFEV
SPEM
Basic Materials
DFEV
SPEM
Communication Services
DFEV
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
DFEV
SPEM
Healthcare
DFEV
SPEM
Real Estate
DFEV
SPEM
Utilities
DFEV
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEV vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
DFEV
SPEM
DFEV vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.36 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 2.77 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 10.14 | +8.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 1.98 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.23 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
DFEV vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -64.41% | +45.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -11.36% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -17.62% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.40% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -14.75% | +10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.10% | -0.09% |
Volatility
DFEV vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 5.69%. This indicates that DFEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 5.69% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 13.29% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 15.92% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 17.13% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 18.80% | -2.38% |
DFEV vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEV vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than SPEM's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.02% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.47% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEV and SPEM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to SPEM (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 25.84% vs 18.73% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 18.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.
DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.11% for SPEM.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEV and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer