PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 9.73% return.


DFAX

1D
1.88%
1M
1.96%
6M
7.86%
YTD
15.67%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.13%

MGK

1D
2.46%
1M
3.92%
6M
13.77%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
18.70%
ALL TIME*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.66M$29.75M$28.81M
$126.58M$121.72M$143.33M

DFAX vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.67%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.10%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
9.73%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and MGK is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021

0.66

The correlation between DFAX and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAX
MGK

Technology

19.9%
58.7%

Financial Services

18.5%
4.0%

Industrials

17.2%
2.7%

Basic Materials

9.8%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.3%

Healthcare

5.9%
4.9%

Energy

5.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
16.4%

Utilities

2.8%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

DFAX
19.9%
MGK
58.7%

Financial Services

DFAX
18.5%
MGK
4.0%

Industrials

DFAX
17.2%
MGK
2.7%

Basic Materials

DFAX
9.8%
MGK
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAX
9.2%
MGK
11.3%

Healthcare

DFAX
5.9%
MGK
4.9%

Energy

DFAX
5.6%
MGK

-

Consumer Defensive

DFAX
5.0%
MGK
0.4%

Communication Services

DFAX
4.2%
MGK
16.4%

Utilities

DFAX
2.8%
MGK
1.0%

Real Estate

DFAX
1.8%
MGK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAX vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAXMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.17

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

3.64

+6.17

DFAX vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-48.43%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-16.85%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-23.36%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.68%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-7.57%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

5.40%

-2.38%

Volatility

DFAX vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 5.46%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

6.53%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

14.98%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

18.38%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

22.98%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

22.05%

-5.87%

DFAX vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than MGK's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.29%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAX and MGK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to DFAX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 3-year performance, MGK leads with 24.88% vs 19.83% for DFAX. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MGK has performed better with a 24.88% return vs 19.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAX.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.

DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAX and 0.05% for MGK.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer