DFAX vs. MGK
DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 20.90%/yr vs 26.77%/yr for MGK. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
DFAX vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 10.01% return.
DFAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
DFAX vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.23% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and MGK is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DFAX and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAX vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAX
MGK
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAX
MGK
Industrials
DFAX
MGK
Basic Materials
DFAX
MGK
Technology
DFAX
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
DFAX
MGK
Energy
DFAX
MGK
-
Healthcare
DFAX
MGK
Utilities
DFAX
MGK
Consumer Defensive
DFAX
MGK
Communication Services
DFAX
MGK
Real Estate
DFAX
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
MGK
DFAX vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.79 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 6.15 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.86 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -47.97% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -16.85% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -23.36% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -7.47% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.89% | -2.09% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 4.01%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.01% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 12.37% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 16.23% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 22.63% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 21.88% | -5.89% |
DFAX vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAX vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than MGK's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAX and MGK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs MGK's -47.97%.
On 3-year performance, MGK leads with 26.77% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MGK has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.
DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.
DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.05% for MGK.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAX and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer