DFAU vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

DFAU and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAU is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

DFAU vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFAU vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	-3.36%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-16.99%	26.89%	6.48%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	1.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.

DFAU

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: -3.36%
• 6M: -0.90%
• 1Y: 18.61%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAU vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFAU

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

Return for Risk

DFAU vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 66
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAU	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.82	-0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.25	-0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.71	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	10.04	-2.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAU vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAU	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.82	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.25	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.09	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and GLDM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DFAU vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	1.03%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAU	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-21.63%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-19.14%	+6.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	-20.92%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.03%	-13.19%	+7.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-6.04%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	5.16%	-2.56%

Volatility

DFAU vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) is 5.37%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that DFAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAU	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	11.01%	-5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	24.07%	-14.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	27.57%	-9.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	17.65%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	16.77%	+0.11%