DFAS vs. VIOV
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VIOV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. DFAS is actively managed, while VIOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAS returned 15.22%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for VIOV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIOV.
Performance
DFAS vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
DFAS vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and VIOV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFAS and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAS vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
VIOV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAS
VIOV
Industrials
DFAS
VIOV
Technology
DFAS
VIOV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
VIOV
Healthcare
DFAS
VIOV
Energy
DFAS
VIOV
Basic Materials
DFAS
VIOV
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
VIOV
Utilities
DFAS
VIOV
Communication Services
DFAS
VIOV
Real Estate
DFAS
VIOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
VIOV
DFAS vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAS | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.99 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 13.00 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAS | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.03 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.53 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and VIOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -47.36% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.33% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -28.44% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.28% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -7.38% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.86% | -0.13% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 4.31%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.54% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 11.57% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 18.41% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 21.95% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 23.89% | -3.05% |
DFAS vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than VIOV's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DFAS and VIOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs VIOV's -47.36%.
On 3-year performance, DFAS leads with 15.22% vs 14.29% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 14.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VIOV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.10% for VIOV.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and VIOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer