DFAS vs. SCHD
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. DFAS is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAS returned 15.22%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for SCHD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DFAS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
DFAS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and SCHD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DFAS and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFAS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
SCHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DFAS
SCHD
Industrials
DFAS
SCHD
Technology
DFAS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
SCHD
Healthcare
DFAS
SCHD
Energy
DFAS
SCHD
Basic Materials
DFAS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
SCHD
Utilities
DFAS
SCHD
Communication Services
DFAS
SCHD
Real Estate
DFAS
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
SCHD
DFAS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 5.91 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 14.53 | -4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.49 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.86 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -33.37% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -4.61% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -16.13% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.40% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -3.32% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 1.88% | +0.85% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that DFAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 2.66% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 7.66% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 10.96% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 14.38% | +6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 16.72% | +4.12% |
DFAS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAS has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 3-year performance, DFAS leads with 15.22% vs 15.09% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer