PortfoliosLab logo
DFAR vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFAR and SMH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DFAR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFAR:

0.78

SMH:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

DFAR:

1.20

SMH:

0.18

Omega Ratio

DFAR:

1.16

SMH:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

DFAR:

0.67

SMH:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

DFAR:

2.41

SMH:

-0.23

Ulcer Index

DFAR:

6.07%

SMH:

15.52%

Daily Std Dev

DFAR:

17.85%

SMH:

43.26%

Max Drawdown

DFAR:

-32.27%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

DFAR:

-9.70%

SMH:

-14.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's -1.00% return.


DFAR

YTD

1.49%

1M

-0.34%

6M

-6.53%

1Y

11.66%

3Y*

0.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMH

YTD

-1.00%

1M

9.46%

6M

-0.54%

1Y

0.14%

3Y*

26.07%

5Y*

28.60%

10Y*

24.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dimensional US Real Estate ETF

VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF

DFAR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFAR vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFAR is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFAR is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFAR is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFAR is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFAR is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFAR is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFAR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DFAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAR and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DFAR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than SMH's 0.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.83%2.89%3.06%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.45%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

DFAR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and SMH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DFAR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) is 4.72%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that DFAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...