DFAE vs. VTV
DFAE (Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. DFAE is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAE returned 8.77%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for VTV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
DFAE vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAE achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 13.16% return.
DFAE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.97%
- 1Y
- 49.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
DFAE vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | 25.28% | 31.48% | 7.68% | 12.63% | -17.52% | 3.53% | 4.85% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.16% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAE and VTV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DFAE and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAE vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAE
VTV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DFAE
VTV
Financial Services
DFAE
VTV
Industrials
DFAE
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAE
VTV
Basic Materials
DFAE
VTV
Communication Services
DFAE
VTV
Energy
DFAE
VTV
Healthcare
DFAE
VTV
Consumer Defensive
DFAE
VTV
Utilities
DFAE
VTV
Real Estate
DFAE
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAE vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAE
VTV
DFAE vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 4.41 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 16.67 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.77 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.83 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
DFAE vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAE drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAE and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -59.27% | +27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -6.35% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | -14.52% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.19% | -17.04% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | 0.00% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -7.87% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 1.68% | +1.62% |
Volatility
DFAE vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that DFAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 2.48% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | 7.57% | +8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 10.12% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 13.88% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 16.66% | +1.18% |
DFAE vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAE vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
DFAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than VTV's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | 1.75% | 2.20% | 2.35% | 2.43% | 2.85% | 1.63% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAE and VTV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAE has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAE dropped -32.21% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.41% vs 8.77% for DFAE. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFAE.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.75% for DFAE.
DFAE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DFAE and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAE and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer