DFAC vs. RPV
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV).
DFAC and RPV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAC is an actively managed fund by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021. RPV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFAC or RPV.
Key characteristics
| DFAC | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.58% | 15.76% |
| 1Y Return | 37.95% | 33.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.80% | 7.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.88 | 2.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.95 | 3.07 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.38 | 1.70 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.75 | 10.81 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.00% | 3.00% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.03% | 15.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.12% | -75.32% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAC and RPV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DFAC vs. RPV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DFAC achieves a 23.58% return, which is significantly higher than RPV's 15.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFAC vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RPV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFAC vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFAC vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison
DFAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RPV's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.08% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
DFAC vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAC drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAC and RPV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFAC vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is 4.51%, while Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that DFAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.