DES vs. GLDM
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - DES is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DES returned 5.96%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
DES vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.
DES
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
DES vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 15.19% | 0.25% | 9.93% | 16.50% | -10.96% | 26.51% | -4.26% | 20.26% | -16.66% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and GLDM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.06 |
DES vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DES
GLDM
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
DES
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
DES
GLDM
-
Industrials
DES
GLDM
-
Energy
DES
GLDM
-
Real Estate
DES
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
DES
GLDM
Technology
DES
GLDM
-
Utilities
DES
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
DES
GLDM
-
Communication Services
DES
GLDM
-
Healthcare
DES
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
DES
GLDM
DES vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.24 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.63 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.70 | +1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 4.23 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.24 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.04 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.02 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -21.63% | -43.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -19.14% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -19.14% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -20.92% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -17.65% | +16.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -6.22% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 7.69% | -5.01% |
Volatility
DES vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 4.19%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 5.47% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 22.99% | -11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 26.39% | -9.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 17.91% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 16.85% | +5.12% |
DES vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.40% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and GLDM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to DES (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 5.96% for DES. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while GLDM is Gold. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.10% for GLDM.
DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DES and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer