DEM vs. MFEM
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM).
DEM and MFEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEM is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2007. MFEM is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. Both DEM and MFEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DEM or MFEM.
Correlation
The correlation between DEM and MFEM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DEM vs. MFEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DEM:
0.62
MFEM:
0.73
DEM:
0.94
MFEM:
1.08
DEM:
1.12
MFEM:
1.14
DEM:
0.86
MFEM:
0.64
DEM:
2.26
MFEM:
2.74
DEM:
3.98%
MFEM:
3.86%
DEM:
14.64%
MFEM:
14.48%
DEM:
-51.85%
MFEM:
-42.28%
DEM:
-9.44%
MFEM:
-8.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than MFEM's 6.05% return.
DEM
4.90%
-1.21%
-4.12%
7.24%
3.80%
4.76%
MFEM
6.05%
-1.19%
-1.35%
8.61%
4.06%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEM vs. MFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DEM vs. MFEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DEM vs. MFEM - Dividend Comparison
DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than MFEM's 5.66% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.70% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% | 5.51% | 4.10% |
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 5.66% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 2.99% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEM vs. MFEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than MFEM's maximum drawdown of -42.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and MFEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DEM vs. MFEM - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) at 3.40%. This indicates that DEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.