PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM vs. IHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM vs. IHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than IHDG's 9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DEM has underperformed IHDG with an annualized return of 9.26%, while IHDG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


DEM

1D
0.19%
1M
0.60%
6M
10.28%
YTD
17.08%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.26%
ALL TIME*
4.92%

IHDG

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.24%
6M
6.52%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
10.45%
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.90M$9.48M$10.87M
$6.12M$5.27M$6.91M

DEM vs. IHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
17.08%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%26.26%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
9.83%14.17%5.97%20.00%-11.53%19.75%10.51%33.42%-12.03%21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM and IHDG is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2014

0.61

The correlation between DEM and IHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEM vs. IHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEM
IHDG

Financial Services

21.9%
15.2%

Technology

17.5%
8.3%

Industrials

8.9%
19.3%

Energy

6.2%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
19.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%
5.4%

Utilities

3.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

3.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.6%
9.4%

Financial Services

DEM
21.9%
IHDG
15.2%

Technology

DEM
17.5%
IHDG
8.3%

Industrials

DEM
8.9%
IHDG
19.3%

Energy

DEM
6.2%
IHDG
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

DEM
5.8%
IHDG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DEM
5.4%
IHDG
19.6%

Basic Materials

DEM
3.7%
IHDG
5.4%

Utilities

DEM
3.0%
IHDG
0.8%

Communication Services

DEM
3.0%
IHDG
4.2%

Real Estate

DEM
2.9%
IHDG
0.3%

Healthcare

DEM
0.6%
IHDG
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM vs. IHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IHDG
IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEM vs. IHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMIHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.96

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

7.40

+2.10

DEM vs. IHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the IHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM and IHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEM vs. IHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than IHDG's maximum drawdown of -29.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and IHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMIHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.85%

-29.24%

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-10.49%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-18.88%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-19.52%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

-29.24%

-8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-1.38%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-4.00%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.77%

-0.16%

Volatility

DEM vs. IHDG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) at 4.09%. This indicates that DEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMIHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

4.09%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

11.88%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

14.30%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

14.95%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.63%

+2.22%

DEM vs. IHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IHDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM vs. IHDG - Dividend Comparison

DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than IHDG's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
4.18%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
1.81%1.84%2.42%1.70%13.79%2.77%1.94%1.99%0.22%1.28%1.91%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEM and IHDG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEM has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to IHDG (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs IHDG's -29.24%.

On 10-year performance, IHDG leads with 10.45% vs 9.26% for DEM. On fees, IHDG is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IHDG has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHDG is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.81% for IHDG.

DEM is categorized as Dividend, while IHDG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index, while IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.58% for IHDG.

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM and IHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer