PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEP vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.15%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


DEEP

1D
-2.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.91%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
8.15%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
12.39%5.69%-2.97%22.37%-17.71%35.66%-9.96%12.54%-7.17%27.19%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and SCHD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.76

The correlation between DEEP and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DEEP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEP
SCHD

Industrials

25.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
19.2%

Financial Services

8.6%
9.3%

Technology

8.5%
16.4%

Healthcare

6.6%
18.8%

Energy

5.7%
16.2%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Industrials

DEEP
25.8%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEP
25.5%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

DEEP
10.5%
SCHD
19.2%

Financial Services

DEEP
8.6%
SCHD
9.3%

Technology

DEEP
8.5%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

DEEP
6.6%
SCHD
18.8%

Energy

DEEP
5.7%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

DEEP
4.8%
SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

DEEP
4.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

DEEP
3.1%
SCHD

-

Utilities

DEEP

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP
DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEPSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

5.91

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

14.53

-7.77

DEEP vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEPSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.49

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.58

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.86

-0.57

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEPSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.52%

-33.37%

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-4.61%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-16.13%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.40%

-16.85%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

-33.37%

-19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-1.40%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-3.32%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

1.88%

+2.24%

Volatility

DEEP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEPSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

2.66%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

7.66%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

10.96%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

14.38%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

16.72%

+7.55%

DEEP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
1.52%1.78%1.96%1.67%1.28%1.43%4.03%3.49%1.51%2.01%3.14%3.98%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 8.15% for DEEP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.

DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEP and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer