DEEP vs. IVV
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEEP returned 8.67%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for IVV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
DEEP vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 8.67%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
DEEP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 17.11%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
DEEP vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 17.11% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 27.19% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.76% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and IVV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DEEP and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
IVV
Industrials
DEEP
IVV
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
IVV
Financial Services
DEEP
IVV
Technology
DEEP
IVV
Healthcare
DEEP
IVV
Energy
DEEP
IVV
Basic Materials
DEEP
IVV
Communication Services
DEEP
IVV
Real Estate
DEEP
IVV
Utilities
DEEP
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
IVV
DEEP vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEP | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.03 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 13.61 | -6.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, roughly equal to the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -55.25% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -8.89% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -18.75% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -24.53% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | -33.90% | -18.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.74% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -10.76% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 1.98% | +2.14% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.67%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 4.67% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 9.75% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 12.41% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 16.97% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 18.10% | +6.17% |
DEEP vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and IVV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEEP has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to IVV (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.75% vs 8.67% for DEEP. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer