PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than VOOV's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 10.94%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.95%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
10.94%

VOOV

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
7.53%
6M
6.93%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.75%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.53%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and VOOV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.74

The correlation between DDWM and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
VOOV

Industrials

21.1%
11.0%

Financial Services

20.7%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
11.1%

Technology

9.0%
19.0%

Healthcare

8.6%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
9.5%

Basic Materials

5.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.4%
3.3%

Utilities

5.2%
4.6%

Energy

3.7%
7.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.4%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
VOOV
11.0%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
VOOV
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
VOOV
11.1%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
VOOV
19.0%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
VOOV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
VOOV
9.5%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
VOOV
3.5%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
VOOV
3.3%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
VOOV
4.6%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
VOOV
7.6%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
VOOV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.22

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

12.21

-5.16

DDWM vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum VOOV drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-37.31%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-6.27%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-17.55%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-18.10%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-37.31%

+2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-1.25%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.83%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.65%

+1.28%

Volatility

DDWM vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.97%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.97%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

7.36%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

9.97%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

14.44%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

16.92%

-1.78%

DDWM vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.32%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and VOOV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VOOV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 12.10% vs 10.94% for DDWM. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.67% for VOOV.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer