DDWM vs. LVHI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DDWM (WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDWM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while LVHI is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDWM returned 10.64%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for LVHI. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

DDWM vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 18.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed LVHI with an annualized return of 10.64%, while LVHI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.

DDWM

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.71%
• 6M: 5.28%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: 10.64%
• ALL TIME*: 10.83%

LVHI

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.07%
• 6M: 13.36%
• YTD: 18.29%
• 1Y: 36.20%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: 11.87%
• ALL TIME*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	$5.12M	$4.14M	$4.85M
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	$37.17M	$30.23M	$26.64M

DDWM vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	9.49%	30.07%	10.70%	15.25%	-0.77%	14.84%	-4.56%	21.43%	-11.75%	18.80%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	18.29%	27.12%	14.81%	17.45%	3.84%	18.19%	-8.76%	18.35%	-5.22%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and LVHI is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016	0.76

The correlation between DDWM and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDWM	LVHI
Industrials	19.3%	13.3%
Financial Services	18.2%	25.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	5.0%
Healthcare	8.2%	7.2%
Technology	7.4%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	10.4%
Basic Materials	5.8%	6.3%
Utilities	5.2%	10.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	6.1%
Energy	3.7%	14.0%
Real Estate	2.7%	2.2%

Return for Risk

DDWM vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDWM

DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 68
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 61

LVHI

LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 97
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDWM vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDWM	LVHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	3.72	-2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	5.08	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.71	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	5.76	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	24.05	-16.70

DDWM vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and LVHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDWM	LVHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.00%	-32.31%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-6.08%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-11.99%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.79%	-11.99%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.00%	-32.31%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.70%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.47%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	1.45%	+1.48%

Volatility

DDWM vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.48%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDWM	LVHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	2.48%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	7.58%	+3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	9.46%	+3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	11.05%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	13.70%	+1.37%

DDWM vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDWM and LVHI have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

DDWM vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than LVHI's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	2.52%	2.47%	3.57%	4.46%	4.28%	3.73%	3.52%	3.63%	4.40%	2.65%	4.00%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	4.51%	4.92%	3.98%	8.12%	7.74%	4.13%	3.97%	6.67%	10.67%	3.38%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDWM and LVHI in my portfolio?

DDWM and LVHI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDWM or LVHI?

DDWM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to LVHI (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

Which ETF is better, DDWM or LVHI?

On 10-year performance, LVHI leads with 11.87% vs 10.64% for DDWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDWM or LVHI?

Over the 10-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 11.87% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDWM or LVHI?

DDWM and LVHI have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDWM or LVHI?

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 2.52% for DDWM.

What is the main difference between DDWM and LVHI?

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Dividend. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.