PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
10.36%

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.51%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and FDVV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.77

The correlation between DDWM and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
FDVV

Industrials

21.1%
3.4%

Financial Services

20.6%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
13.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
3.1%

Technology

8.1%
29.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
11.0%

Communication Services

5.5%
3.7%

Utilities

5.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Energy

4.1%

-

Real Estate

3.1%
10.1%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
FDVV
3.4%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
FDVV
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
FDVV
13.6%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
FDVV
3.1%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
FDVV
29.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
FDVV
11.0%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
FDVV
3.7%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
FDVV
8.7%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
FDVV

-

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
FDVV

-

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
FDVV
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.35

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

3.28

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.53

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

10.54

-3.55

DDWM vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.35

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.79

-0.10

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-40.25%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.30%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-15.90%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-20.18%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.12%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.81%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.23%

+0.64%

Volatility

DDWM vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.14%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

7.99%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

10.06%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

14.75%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

17.00%

-1.69%

DDWM vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.33%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and FDVV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 12.22% for DDWM. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.33% for DDWM.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer