DDM vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
DDM and IMCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DDM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both DDM and IMCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DDM or IMCG.
Performance
DDM vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 27.37% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has outperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 17.30%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
DDM
27.37%
0.36%
15.04%
47.51%
14.11%
17.30%
IMCG
19.66%
2.73%
10.79%
32.48%
13.40%
12.08%
Key characteristics
| DDM | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.15 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.88 | 3.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.02 | 1.43 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.60 | 11.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.08% | 2.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.96% | 14.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.70% | -58.96% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.81% | -2.63% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DDM vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and IMCG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DDM vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DDM vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than IMCG's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 0.78% | 0.39% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.79% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
DDM vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than IMCG's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and IMCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DDM vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 4.71%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.