PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.72%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
7.57%
6M
9.50%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
9.72%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDIV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
7.57%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.72

The correlation between DDIV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDIV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
VOO

Energy

27.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

21.5%
11.6%

Real Estate

15.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.9%

Industrials

7.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
10.2%

Utilities

5.1%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.3%

Technology

1.1%
35.7%

Energy

DDIV
27.8%
VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

DDIV
21.5%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.4%
VOO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.1%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

DDIV
7.0%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.5%
VOO
10.2%

Utilities

DDIV
5.1%
VOO
2.4%

Healthcare

DDIV
3.7%
VOO
8.5%

Basic Materials

DDIV
2.9%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.9%
VOO
11.3%

Technology

DDIV
1.1%
VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDIV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDIVVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

2.39

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

3.25

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.16

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

14.73

-8.02

DDIV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDIVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.39

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.89

-0.41

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-33.99%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-8.90%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-18.69%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-24.52%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-33.99%

-13.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.70%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-3.69%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.91%

+1.16%

Volatility

DDIV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 2.62%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.84%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

8.90%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

11.80%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

16.81%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

18.01%

+1.89%

DDIV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.61%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to DDIV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 9.72% for DDIV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

DDIV is categorized as Momentum, while VOO is S&P 500. DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer