PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCBO vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCBO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Docebo Inc (DCBO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCBO achieves a -24.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return.


DCBO

1D
-11.32%
1M
-20.98%
YTD
-24.50%
6M
-22.41%
1Y
-38.04%
3Y*
-21.46%
5Y*
-20.27%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCBO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DCBO
Docebo Inc
-24.50%-50.41%-7.46%45.99%-50.80%3.49%30.18%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DCBO and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.55

The correlation between DCBO and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCBO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCBO
DCBO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DCBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCBO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DCBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCBO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCBO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Docebo Inc (DCBO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCBOSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.74

1.60

-2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.90

2.18

-3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.28

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

1.51

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.24

5.04

-6.28

DCBO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCBO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCBOSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

1.60

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.70

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.84

-1.19

Drawdowns

DCBO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCBO drawdown since its inception was -84.08%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCBO and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCBOSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.08%

-34.59%

-49.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.35%

-16.41%

-37.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.03%

-23.39%

-49.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.08%

-34.59%

-49.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.85%

-1.78%

-80.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-5.20%

-47.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.78%

4.90%

+25.88%

Volatility

DCBO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Docebo Inc (DCBO) has a higher volatility of 23.38% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that DCBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCBOSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.38%

3.61%

+19.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.46%

11.62%

+34.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.78%

15.50%

+36.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.78%

22.27%

+29.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.41%

21.55%

+30.86%

Dividends

DCBO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DCBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCBO
Docebo Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCBO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCBO has higher volatility (23.38%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCBO dropped -84.08% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCBO and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer