PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBOEY vs. NDAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deutsche Boerse AG ADR (DBOEY) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBOEY achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than NDAQ's -14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DBOEY has underperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of 15.40%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.


DBOEY

1D
1.30%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
8.93%
6M
8.60%
1Y
-9.29%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
15.40%

NDAQ

1D
-0.15%
1M
-9.04%
YTD
-14.50%
6M
-15.27%
1Y
-3.69%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBOEY
Deutsche Boerse AG ADR
8.93%15.89%14.37%22.36%5.51%-0.35%9.85%32.55%4.89%51.57%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
-14.50%27.19%34.85%-3.66%-11.19%60.13%25.99%33.88%8.21%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DBOEY and NDAQ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2008

0.35

The correlation between DBOEY and NDAQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBOEY:

$51.28B

NDAQ:

$47.16B

EPS

DBOEY:

€1.15

NDAQ:

$3.32

PE Ratio

DBOEY:

21.44

NDAQ:

24.86

PEG Ratio

DBOEY:

1.70

NDAQ:

2.39

PS Ratio

DBOEY:

5.92

NDAQ:

5.75

PB Ratio

DBOEY:

4.30

NDAQ:

3.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBOEY:

€7.63B

NDAQ:

$8.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBOEY:

€4.14B

NDAQ:

$4.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

DBOEY:

€3.76B

NDAQ:

$3.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBOEY vs. NDAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBOEY
DBOEY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DBOEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBOEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBOEY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DBOEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBOEY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NDAQ
NDAQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NDAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deutsche Boerse AG ADR (DBOEY) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBOEYNDAQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.00

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.17

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

-0.38

-0.19

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBOEY Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the NDAQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBOEY and NDAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBOEY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, smaller than the maximum NDAQ drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBOEY and NDAQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBOEYNDAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.48%

-68.48%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.09%

-21.76%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.71%

-21.76%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-32.84%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.66%

-38.31%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.01%

-17.76%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-23.80%

+10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.39%

9.79%

+6.60%

Volatility

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deutsche Boerse AG ADR (DBOEY) is 4.81%, while Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that DBOEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBOEYNDAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

10.54%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

22.01%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.37%

25.70%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

24.17%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

24.37%

-0.83%

Dividends

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison

DBOEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than NDAQ's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBOEY
Deutsche Boerse AG ADR
1.76%1.71%1.76%1.93%2.05%1.38%1.21%1.27%1.64%3.82%5.49%2.63%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.36%1.08%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%

Financials

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deutsche Boerse AG ADR and Nasdaq, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B20222023202420252026
2.03B
2.14B
(DBOEY) Total Revenue
(NDAQ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DBOEY values in EUR, NDAQ values in USD

DBOEY vs. NDAQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Deutsche Boerse AG ADR and Nasdaq, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
59.0%
65.8%
Portfolio components
DBOEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Boerse AG ADR reported a gross profit of 1.20B and revenue of 2.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

NDAQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 2.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.

DBOEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Boerse AG ADR reported an operating income of 882.00M and revenue of 2.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.

NDAQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported an operating income of 657.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

DBOEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Boerse AG ADR reported a net income of 585.00M and revenue of 2.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.

NDAQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a net income of 519.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DBOEY and NDAQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDAQ has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to DBOEY (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBOEY dropped -56.48% vs NDAQ's -68.48%.

NDAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBOEY and NDAQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer