DBLTX vs. IUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB).
DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Performance
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | -0.07% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | -1.33% | 7.62% | 9.13% | -0.27% | 3.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLTX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX has underperformed IUSB with an annualized return of 1.83%, while IUSB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return.
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
IUSB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLTX vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
DBLTX
IUSB
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLTX | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.56 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.92 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 5.96 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLTX | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.09 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.41 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.46 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLTX and IUSB is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
DBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLTX drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLTX and IUSB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLTX | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -17.90% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.49% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | -17.87% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.49% | -17.90% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.81% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -3.62% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.80% | +0.17% |
Volatility
DBLTX vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.62%. This indicates that DBLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLTX | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 1.62% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.41% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 4.13% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 5.77% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 5.03% | -0.65% |