DBJP vs. EWT
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT).
DBJP and EWT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. EWT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Taiwan Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2000. Both DBJP and EWT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBJP or EWT.
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and EWT is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DBJP vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DBJP:
0.74
EWT:
1.09
DBJP:
1.05
EWT:
1.56
DBJP:
1.15
EWT:
1.20
DBJP:
0.70
EWT:
1.46
DBJP:
2.22
EWT:
4.58
DBJP:
6.77%
EWT:
5.08%
DBJP:
20.35%
EWT:
21.40%
DBJP:
-31.30%
EWT:
-64.26%
DBJP:
-6.74%
EWT:
-8.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 0.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBJP having a 10.42% annualized return and EWT not far ahead at 10.45%.
DBJP
-2.18%
-0.80%
-2.68%
13.49%
14.42%
10.42%
EWT
0.52%
0.35%
-1.74%
18.16%
11.82%
10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBJP vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBJP vs. EWT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DBJP
EWT
DBJP vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DBJP vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than EWT's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.86% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% | 10.53% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.37% | 0.37% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 2.64% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and EWT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DBJP vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is 5.26%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that DBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.