PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEU vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEU vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEU achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEU has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 11.45%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


DBEU

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.12%
6M
9.37%
YTD
13.04%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

EDEN

1D
-2.33%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-5.46%
YTD
0.71%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19M$1.29M$2.18M
$542.51K$1.19M$1.06M

DBEU vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
13.04%22.18%9.17%17.43%-6.25%23.99%-1.42%27.32%-8.49%14.60%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
0.71%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEU and EDEN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.64

The correlation between DBEU and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEU vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEU
EDEN

Financial Services

25.1%
15.5%

Industrials

18.5%
29.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
38.3%

Technology

9.4%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
4.8%

Energy

4.9%
0.9%

Utilities

4.4%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

DBEU
25.1%
EDEN
15.5%

Industrials

DBEU
18.5%
EDEN
29.0%

Healthcare

DBEU
12.8%
EDEN
38.3%

Technology

DBEU
9.4%
EDEN
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

DBEU
8.5%
EDEN
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEU
6.0%
EDEN
2.8%

Basic Materials

DBEU
5.4%
EDEN
4.8%

Energy

DBEU
4.9%
EDEN
0.9%

Utilities

DBEU
4.4%
EDEN
3.2%

Communication Services

DBEU
3.1%
EDEN

-

Real Estate

DBEU
0.7%
EDEN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEU vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBEU
DBEU Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBEU vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEUEDENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

0.59

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

1.37

+8.71

DBEU vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEU and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEU vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEU drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum EDEN drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEU and EDEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEUEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-36.61%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-21.17%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-29.31%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-36.61%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-36.61%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-10.20%

+9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-7.41%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

9.04%

-6.64%

Volatility

DBEU vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) is 3.81%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that DBEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEUEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.77%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

15.53%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

19.78%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

20.37%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

19.20%

-2.96%

DBEU vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEU vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

DBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than EDEN's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
1.40%4.55%0.07%3.64%1.96%1.87%2.44%2.77%3.55%2.28%9.92%5.50%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
3.04%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEU and EDEN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDEN has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to DBEU (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEU dropped -34.50% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

On 10-year performance, DBEU leads with 11.45% vs 9.03% for EDEN. On fees, DBEU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEU has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEU has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.

EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.40% for DBEU.

DBEU tracks MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBEU and 0.53% for EDEN.

DBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEU and EDEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer