PortfoliosLab logo
DBEM vs. EEMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and EEMX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DBEM vs. EEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBEM:

0.50

EEMX:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

DBEM:

0.69

EEMX:

0.92

Omega Ratio

DBEM:

1.09

EEMX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

DBEM:

0.38

EEMX:

0.41

Martin Ratio

DBEM:

1.45

EEMX:

1.81

Ulcer Index

DBEM:

5.03%

EEMX:

5.97%

Daily Std Dev

DBEM:

18.15%

EEMX:

19.61%

Max Drawdown

DBEM:

-33.50%

EEMX:

-39.91%

Current Drawdown

DBEM:

-7.75%

EEMX:

-11.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than EEMX's 9.13% return.


DBEM

YTD

4.50%

1M

2.55%

6M

4.31%

1Y

9.07%

3Y*

6.24%

5Y*

6.48%

10Y*

3.83%

EEMX

YTD

9.13%

1M

4.22%

6M

7.55%

1Y

12.84%

3Y*

5.10%

5Y*

6.93%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBEM vs. EEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBEM vs. EEMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBEM is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBEM is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBEM is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBEM is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBEM is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBEM is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMX is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMX is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMX is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMX is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBEM vs. EEMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the EEMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and EEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DBEM vs. EEMX - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than EEMX's 2.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.37%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%2.08%
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
2.07%2.26%2.20%2.38%1.72%1.42%2.57%2.41%2.45%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. EEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum EEMX drawdown of -39.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and EEMX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DBEM vs. EEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is 3.62%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that DBEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...