DBEF vs. DXJ
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.79%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for DXJ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
DBEF vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 12.79%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 53.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
DBEF vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 11.60% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and DXJ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DBEF and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
DXJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DBEF
DXJ
Industrials
DBEF
DXJ
Healthcare
DBEF
DXJ
Technology
DBEF
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
DXJ
Basic Materials
DBEF
DXJ
Communication Services
DBEF
DXJ
Energy
DBEF
DXJ
Utilities
DBEF
DXJ
Real Estate
DBEF
DXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
DXJ
DBEF vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 4.88 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 18.93 | -7.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -49.63% | +17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -10.98% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -22.19% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -22.19% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -39.14% | +6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.34% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -14.32% | +9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.83% | -0.60% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.64% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 13.56% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 17.73% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 19.02% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 20.17% | -4.37% |
DBEF vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than DXJ's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 4.97% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and DXJ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXJ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to DBEF (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 12.79% for DBEF. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.
DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while DXJ is Japan Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer