DBA vs. FTGC
DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. DBA is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBA returned 3.54%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for FTGC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBA charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
DBA vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DBA has underperformed FTGC with an annualized return of 3.54%, while FTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.77% annualized return.
DBA
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
DBA vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 5.25% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -6.06% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 27.15% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -12.75% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBA and FTGC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between DBA and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBA vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
DBA
FTGC
DBA vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBA | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.47 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 5.25 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 17.39 | -16.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBA | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.66 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.82 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DBA vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, which is greater than FTGC's maximum drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBA | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.97% | -59.47% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.91% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -10.39% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.94% | -22.64% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | -35.91% | -5.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.90% | -4.65% | -21.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.11% | -27.42% | -13.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.38% | +1.69% |
Volatility
DBA vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) is 4.17%, while First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that DBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBA | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 4.50% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 13.15% | -6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 15.59% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 16.00% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 14.71% | -1.62% |
DBA vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBA has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBA vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than FTGC's 15.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.40% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.08% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBA and FTGC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTGC has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to DBA (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBA dropped -67.97% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 10-year performance, FTGC leads with 7.77% vs 3.54% for DBA. On fees, DBA is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBA is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.08%, compared with 3.40% for DBA.
DBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for DBA and 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBA and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer