DBA vs. FALN
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN).
DBA and FALN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. Both DBA and FALN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBA or FALN.
Correlation
The correlation between DBA and FALN is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DBA vs. FALN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DBA:
0.78
FALN:
1.07
DBA:
1.16
FALN:
1.46
DBA:
1.14
FALN:
1.19
DBA:
0.33
FALN:
1.86
DBA:
2.27
FALN:
6.93
DBA:
5.92%
FALN:
0.76%
DBA:
17.28%
FALN:
4.91%
DBA:
-67.97%
FALN:
-29.22%
DBA:
-28.17%
FALN:
-2.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -0.02% return.
DBA
1.47%
3.02%
9.91%
13.70%
17.08%
2.94%
FALN
-0.02%
-1.93%
-0.19%
5.16%
9.03%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBA vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBA has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBA vs. FALN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DBA
FALN
DBA vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DBA vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison
DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than FALN's 6.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 4.02% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.32% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
Drawdowns
DBA vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, which is greater than FALN's maximum drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and FALN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DBA vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) at 2.18%. This indicates that DBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.