PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DB vs. UBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DB vs. UBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB) and UBS Group AG (UBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DB achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than UBS's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DB has underperformed UBS with an annualized return of 9.80%, while UBS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


DB

1D
0.40%
1M
7.68%
YTD
-13.13%
6M
-7.36%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
9.80%

UBS

1D
0.35%
1M
10.23%
YTD
5.33%
6M
25.92%
1Y
52.77%
3Y*
38.63%
5Y*
27.02%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DB vs. UBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DB
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
-13.13%132.42%29.52%21.34%-5.86%14.68%40.10%-2.89%-56.72%18.96%
UBS
UBS Group AG
5.33%60.21%2.03%67.65%5.92%27.93%17.99%7.15%-32.68%21.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DB and UBS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2014

0.71

The correlation between DB and UBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

DB:

$4.47

UBS:

$2.24

PE Ratio

DB:

7.23

UBS:

21.53

PEG Ratio

DB:

0.12

UBS:

0.39

PS Ratio

DB:

0.96

UBS:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

DB:

$53.12B

UBS:

$64.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DB:

$30.48B

UBS:

$42.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

DB:

$9.93B

UBS:

$11.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DB vs. UBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DB
DB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DB Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

UBS
UBS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
UBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DB vs. UBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB) and UBS Group AG (UBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBUBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.02

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

2.77

-1.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.33

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.03

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.69

5.40

-3.72

DB vs. UBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DB Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the UBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DB and UBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBUBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.02

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.90

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.52

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.40

-0.37

Drawdowns

DB vs. UBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DB drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than UBS's maximum drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DB and UBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.73%

-61.38%

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.66%

-26.07%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.66%

-27.00%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.19%

-33.41%

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.97%

-61.38%

-10.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.08%

-0.95%

-63.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.67%

-19.27%

-34.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.20%

9.81%

+2.39%

Volatility

DB vs. UBS - Volatility Comparison

Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to UBS Group AG (UBS) at 7.40%. This indicates that DB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

7.40%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.83%

20.52%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.59%

26.25%

+6.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.37%

30.29%

+7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.23%

30.38%

+9.85%

Dividends

DB vs. UBS - Dividend Comparison

DB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than UBS's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DB
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
3.60%1.99%2.87%2.40%1.84%0.00%0.00%1.58%1.58%1.00%0.00%3.11%
UBS
UBS Group AG
1.14%2.92%3.46%0.89%1.34%1.04%3.87%5.48%0.00%3.30%5.42%3.87%

Financials

DB vs. UBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft and UBS Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
15.29B
20.20B
(DB) Total Revenue
(UBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DB vs. UBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft and UBS Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
53.3%
71.8%
Portfolio components
DB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 15.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

UBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a gross profit of 14.51B and revenue of 20.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.8%.

DB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported an operating income of 3.04B and revenue of 15.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

UBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported an operating income of 3.77B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

DB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 15.29B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

UBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a net income of 2.98B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DB and UBS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DB has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to UBS (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DB dropped -94.73% vs UBS's -61.38%.

UBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DB and UBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer