DAR vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DAR or CDNS.
Key characteristics
| DAR | CDNS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -11.38% | 6.08% |
| 1Y Return | -30.04% | 41.53% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -16.10% | 33.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.99% | 33.36% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.43% | 33.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.77 | 1.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.85% | 28.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.89% | -93.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.33% | -10.49% |
Fundamentals
| DAR | CDNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.41B | $78.23B |
| EPS | $3.35 | $3.85 |
| PE Ratio | 13.84 | 74.67 |
| PEG Ratio | 14.47 | 2.84 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.42B | $4.08B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.53B | $3.19B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $976.84M | $1.36B |
Correlation
The correlation between DAR and CDNS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DAR vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DAR achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DAR has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 8.43%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 33.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DAR vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DAR vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DAR nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DAR vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAR drawdown since its inception was -97.89%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAR and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DAR vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.21%. This indicates that DAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
DAR vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Darling Ingredients Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities