PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAR vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAR vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAR achieves a 70.97% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DAR has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 14.80%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.


DAR

1D
2.01%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
70.97%
6M
68.12%
1Y
100.29%
3Y*
-1.32%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*
14.80%

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAR vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAR
Darling Ingredients Inc.
70.97%6.86%-32.40%-20.37%-9.67%20.13%105.41%45.95%6.12%40.43%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DAR and AAPL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 1994

0.19

The correlation between DAR and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DAR:

$1.86

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

DAR:

33.09

AAPL:

37.67

PS Ratio

DAR:

1.17

AAPL:

10.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAR:

$6.31B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAR:

$898.50M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

DAR:

$919.03M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAR vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAR
DAR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAR vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DARAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.88

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

9.76

-1.11

DAR vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAR and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DARAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.40

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.75

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.05

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.44

-0.32

Drawdowns

DAR vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAR drawdown since its inception was -97.89%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAR and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.89%

-81.80%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.61%

-13.80%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.42%

-33.36%

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.31%

-33.36%

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.31%

-38.52%

-29.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.40%

-1.57%

-27.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-29.61%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.63%

5.47%

+6.16%

Volatility

DAR vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that DAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

5.46%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.61%

15.91%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.42%

22.32%

+16.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.24%

27.46%

+12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.74%

28.89%

+9.85%

Dividends

DAR vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

DAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
DAR
Darling Ingredients Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DAR vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Darling Ingredients Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
1.55B
111.18B
(DAR) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAR vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Darling Ingredients Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
49.3%
Portfolio components
DAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darling Ingredients Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

DAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darling Ingredients Inc. reported an operating income of 226.77M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

DAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darling Ingredients Inc. reported a net income of 134.31M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAR and AAPL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAR has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAR dropped -97.89% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

DAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAR and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer