PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAL vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAL vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAL achieves a 24.47% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -23.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DAL has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 10.68%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.62% annualized return.


DAL

1D
2.07%
1M
12.84%
YTD
24.47%
6M
19.87%
1Y
84.21%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
10.68%

MSFT

1D
-3.18%
1M
-12.24%
YTD
-23.71%
6M
-23.91%
1Y
-22.44%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
23.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAL vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
24.47%16.09%52.00%23.03%-15.92%-2.81%-30.77%20.38%-8.66%16.23%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-23.71%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DAL and MSFT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2007

0.27

The correlation between DAL and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAL:

$56.02B

MSFT:

$2.73T

EPS

DAL:

$6.85

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

DAL:

12.54

MSFT:

21.88

PEG Ratio

DAL:

0.08

MSFT:

1.53

PS Ratio

DAL:

0.86

MSFT:

8.61

PB Ratio

DAL:

2.75

MSFT:

6.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAL:

$65.18B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAL:

$17.07B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

DAL:

$9.66B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAL vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAL
DAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAL vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DALMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.86

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

-0.66

+4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

-1.32

+13.13

DAL vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAL and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAL vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAL drawdown since its inception was -81.93%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAL and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DALMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.93%

-69.38%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.90%

-33.91%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.92%

-33.91%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.92%

-37.15%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.18%

-37.15%

-32.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.80%

+31.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.09%

-21.79%

-7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.16%

16.97%

-9.81%

Volatility

DAL vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.08%. This indicates that DAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DALMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

11.08%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.06%

22.93%

+7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.43%

26.01%

+15.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.00%

26.78%

+14.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.25%

27.11%

+15.14%

Dividends

DAL vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

DAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than MSFT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
0.87%0.97%0.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.00%2.57%2.63%1.81%1.37%0.89%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.97%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

DAL vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
15.85B
82.89B
(DAL) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAL vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
28.6%
67.6%
Portfolio components
DAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 15.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

DAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported an operating income of 501.00M and revenue of 15.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

DAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported a net income of -289.00M and revenue of 15.85B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAL and MSFT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAL has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to MSFT (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAL dropped -81.93% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

DAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAL and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer