DAGVX vs. VOOV
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. VOOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DAGVX or VOOV.
Performance
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.
DAGVX
20.72%
0.77%
9.42%
26.78%
14.74%
11.38%
VOOV
16.69%
-0.55%
8.56%
24.47%
12.20%
10.37%
Key characteristics
DAGVX | VOOV | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.46 | 2.51 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.40 | 3.55 |
Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.66 | 4.74 |
Martin Ratio | 16.17 | 15.18 |
Ulcer Index | 1.69% | 1.67% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.14% | 10.07% |
Max Drawdown | -54.89% | -37.31% |
Current Drawdown | -2.03% | -1.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and VOOV is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than VOOV's 1.93% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.11% | 0.58% | 1.51% | 2.06% | 0.96% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 0.91% | 0.65% |
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.93% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% | 1.98% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and VOOV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 3.32%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.