DAGVX vs. VOOV
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. VOOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 0.14% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 12.72%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
VOOV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
VOOV
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGVX | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.27 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.08 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 5.03 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGVX | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.72 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and VOOV is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than VOOV's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.80% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and VOOV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -37.31% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -11.99% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -18.10% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -37.31% | -5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -4.48% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -3.88% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.57% | +0.20% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 3.82%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.82% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 7.77% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 15.59% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 14.50% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 16.96% | +1.86% |