DADA vs. CLSK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dada Nexus Limited (DADA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).

Performance

DADA vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dada Nexus Limited (DADA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DADA vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DADA Dada Nexus Limited	0.00%	61.98%	-63.55%	-52.37%	-47.04%	-63.95%	128.27%
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.	-14.82%	9.88%	-16.50%	440.69%	-78.57%	-67.23%	1,289.95%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) DADA : $9.66B CLSK : $785.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) DADA : $2.44B CLSK : $256.57M
EBITDA (TTM) DADA : -$743.79M CLSK : $131.94M

Returns By Period

DADA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -18.29%
• YTD: -14.82%
• 6M: -40.92%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 45.82%
• 5Y*: -17.81%
• 10Y*: -11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DADA vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK

CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 50
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DADA vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dada Nexus Limited (DADA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DADA	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.06	—

Correlation

The correlation between DADA and CLSK is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DADA vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither DADA nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DADA	CLSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-98.56%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-64.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-88.19%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-69.28%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	34.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DADA	CLSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	70.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	91.38%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	101.40%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	184.27%	—

Financials