CZR vs. BWB
CZR (Caesars Entertainment, Inc.) and BWB (Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.) are both stocks. CZR operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while BWB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CZR returned -22.42%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for BWB. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CZR vs. BWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZR achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than BWB's 16.60% return.
CZR
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- 1Y
- 3.26%
- 3Y*
- -13.33%
- 5Y*
- -22.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
BWB
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CZR vs. BWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZR Caesars Entertainment, Inc. | 25.82% | -30.01% | -28.71% | 12.69% | -55.52% | 25.93% | 24.53% | 64.71% | -2.00% |
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 16.60% | 29.76% | -0.07% | -23.79% | 0.28% | 41.63% | -9.36% | 30.62% | -16.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CZR and BWB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between CZR and BWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CZR:
$6.00B
BWB:
$582.34M
CZR:
-$2.36
BWB:
$1.90
CZR:
0.52
BWB:
2.58
CZR:
1.67
BWB:
1.26
CZR:
$11.56B
BWB:
$224.30M
CZR:
$3.64B
BWB:
$107.29M
CZR:
$2.30B
BWB:
$50.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CZR vs. BWB — Risk / Return Rank
CZR
BWB
CZR vs. BWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) and Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 2.05 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 5.19 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CZR vs. BWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZR drawdown since its inception was -89.78%, which is greater than BWB's maximum drawdown of -59.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZR and BWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.78% | -59.49% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.43% | -15.62% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.45% | -22.19% | -47.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.82% | -59.49% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.37% | 0.00% | -75.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.03% | -20.09% | -11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.73% | 6.17% | +15.56% |
Volatility
CZR vs. BWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) is 2.79%, while Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that CZR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 7.73% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.60% | 17.74% | +18.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.04% | 27.52% | +23.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.46% | 32.43% | +20.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.89% | 34.32% | +26.57% |
Dividends
CZR vs. BWB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CZR nor BWB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CZR vs. BWB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CZR and BWB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWB has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to CZR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZR dropped -89.78% vs BWB's -59.49%.
BWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CZR and BWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer