CZR vs. BWB
CZR (Caesars Entertainment, Inc.) and BWB (Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.) are both stocks. CZR operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while BWB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CZR returned -18.95%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for BWB. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CZR vs. BWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZR achieves a 27.11% return, which is significantly higher than BWB's 18.48% return.
CZR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 44.39%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- -18.76%
- 5Y*
- -18.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.72%
BWB
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 23.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.01M | $3.62M | $3.48M | |
| $88.08M | $107.29M | $190.73M |
CZR vs. BWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZR Caesars Entertainment, Inc. | 27.11% | -30.01% | -28.71% | 12.69% | -55.52% | 25.93% | 24.53% | 64.71% | -2.00% |
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 18.48% | 29.76% | -0.07% | -23.79% | 0.28% | 41.63% | -9.36% | 30.62% | -16.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CZR and BWB is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between CZR and BWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CZR:
$6.06B
BWB:
$579.08M
CZR:
-$2.27
BWB:
$2.65
CZR:
0.52
BWB:
1.50
CZR:
$11.65B
BWB:
$294.46M
CZR:
$3.59B
BWB:
$73.58M
CZR:
$2.12B
BWB:
$110.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CZR vs. BWB — Risk / Return Rank
CZR
BWB
CZR vs. BWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) and Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 2.38 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 6.33 | -5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CZR vs. BWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZR drawdown since its inception was -89.78%, which is greater than BWB's maximum drawdown of -59.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZR and BWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.78% | -59.49% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.91% | -15.62% | -19.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.95% | -22.19% | -45.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.82% | -59.49% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.12% | -7.65% | -67.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -19.87% | -12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.95% | 5.86% | +8.09% |
Volatility
CZR vs. BWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) is 2.90%, while Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that CZR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CZR | BWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 8.16% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.24% | 17.23% | +16.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.14% | 27.32% | +21.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.22% | 32.52% | +19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.86% | 34.22% | +26.64% |
Dividends
CZR vs. BWB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CZR nor BWB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CZR vs. BWB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CZR vs. BWB - Profitability Comparison
CZR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BWB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of -44.84M and revenue of 63.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -70.9%.
CZR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 513.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
BWB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of -22.84M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -36.1%.
CZR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of -62.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
BWB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 14.01M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CZR and BWB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWB has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to CZR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZR dropped -89.78% vs BWB's -59.49%.
BWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CZR and BWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer