PortfoliosLab logo
T vs. CZA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between T and CZA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

T vs. CZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

T:

3.09

CZA:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

T:

3.72

CZA:

0.53

Omega Ratio

T:

1.55

CZA:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

T:

3.79

CZA:

0.27

Martin Ratio

T:

25.27

CZA:

0.93

Ulcer Index

T:

2.83%

CZA:

5.43%

Daily Std Dev

T:

23.02%

CZA:

17.75%

Max Drawdown

T:

-63.88%

CZA:

-53.20%

Current Drawdown

T:

-1.62%

CZA:

-8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a 25.17% return, which is significantly higher than CZA's -0.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with T having a 8.48% annualized return and CZA not far ahead at 8.79%.


T

YTD

25.17%

1M

5.49%

6M

27.58%

1Y

70.65%

5Y*

12.56%

10Y*

8.48%

CZA

YTD

-0.92%

1M

8.79%

6M

-6.94%

1Y

4.06%

5Y*

14.11%

10Y*

8.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

T vs. CZA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of T is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of T is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of T is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of T is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of T is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of T is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CZA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CZA is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CZA is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CZA is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CZA is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CZA is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CZA is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

T vs. CZA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current T Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the CZA Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and CZA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

T vs. CZA - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than CZA's 1.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
T
AT&T Inc.
3.99%4.88%6.63%7.35%11.19%9.58%6.91%9.28%6.67%5.98%7.23%7.25%
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
1.28%1.27%1.36%1.71%0.89%1.42%1.40%1.26%1.10%1.87%1.37%0.74%

Drawdowns

T vs. CZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, which is greater than CZA's maximum drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and CZA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

T vs. CZA - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) at 6.27%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...